![]() ![]() So it really does not matter much how old the core installation is, as it can be updated online. Regarding updates, if you download a couple of years old Fiji installation you can just use the built-in updater for the plugins you need, also for the ImageJ 1.x layer. So there is really not any need to choose any fixed path just use the solution that fits your workflow best, and you can change it later. See the main repository for links to our publications and the full-featured Python package that can also be used to train new models. That goes the other way too nearly everything you develop for ImageJ 1.x will also work in Fiji. This is the ImageJ/Fiji plugin for StarDist, a cell/nuclei detection method for microscopy images with star-convex shape priors.The plugin can be used to apply already trained models to new images. I haven’t let it finish yet as I gave up after 20 minutes. However when opening the same stack in Fiji - which I prefer to use for a few specific plugins - it pulls up the console and takes appears to be going through every single image. Nearly everything that works in Fiji will also work in ImageJ 1.x if you use Java 8 and include the dependency libraries. Using ImageJ the entire stack (10k images) loads within about 5-10 seconds. I work with materials technology, so I prefer to develop my workflow in ImageJ 1.x, and rather move the few plugins I need from Fiji over to my ImageJ 1.x based installation. It loads and runs much faster and is much simpler to use for a non-programmer, since you can just use the “Compile and Run” feature for plugins without any need to learn or understand an code-management system.Īlso, most of the plugins in Fiji were written for bio-sciences and have limited usefulness outside that field. I use both ImageJ 1.x and Fiji and by far prefer the former. Software is preferrably slim, but why choose an inferior piece of software just because it’s “slimmer”? Nobody is running this on a 20 year old machine anyway, saying “oh well, looks like I can only use the inferior ImageJ1 because I can’t be bothered updating to a machine only 15 years old I found on craigslist for free”. One or more software developers invest countless hours of precious time into it. For analyses and brightfield image acquisition of staining, Iba-1 and CSF1R, 8-bit grayscale TIFF images of the. I can’t really understand the “use ImageJ1 if you like slim software” argument. Why would anyone keep updating ImageJ1 (in fact it appears to be updated more frequently than Fiji, at the very least with stable public releases, Fijis latest one is almost TWO FRICKING YEARS OLD!)? Why not have ONE piece of software that includes everything someone might need? Is there anything in ImageJ1 that is not in ImageJ2? Or vince versa? If so, what is the excuse for the other piece of software not to include that new feature? Nowhere you can find information on the actual differences. ![]() Just starting with ImageJ and seriously confused. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |